Some formulas (rules, etc.)

Differential

Study of instantaneous rate of change of functions.
Slope.

What is a function?
A: black box w/ mapping of 1 in to 1 out (not reverse, Vertical Line Test)

Note to self: functions work well for events in time, or causally-linked events.
Note note to self: what are causally linked events?

Polynomial

A function of the form

Intermediate Value Theorem IVT

On any interval of cnts , , where c is in the interval, will be between the values of f at the bounds of the interval.

Min-Max Theorem

Let be continuous on a closed interval. Then it has an absolute max & min on that interval.

Differentiable at

is diffable at if the following limit exists and is finite:

This means the slope of the chord from the two points converges to a finite number.
Alternatively, there is a ‘good’ approx to in a nbhd of .

Equivalent Notation

Use this definition of a derivative to prove formulas.

Leibniz Notation

For derivative at write

Some rules

These are generally proven using the h notation plus limit theorems.




All Da Proofs

MVT

If cts and diffable on then

A policeman stops you and asks to see your toll ticket, which shows that you entered the road 2 hours earlier. The policeman notes that you are exactly 242 km from where you entered. He then gives you a traffic ticket. You protest because you know that in the last several minutes you were driving well under the speed limit. The policeman replies: “Your average speed was 121 km/hour. Therefore by the Mean Value Theorem, at some point in your trip you were traveling at 121 km/hour.”

Generalized MVT

Derivatives of sums are easier than derivatives of products and the log of a product is the sum of the logs

Local minima/maxima: slope is zero

  • Important for optimization!

Linear Approximation

Linearization near a point a:

In the sense that:

So is a tangent line to f at some point a. (Not chord).
Error in approximation:

Equivalently,

Where is some point on domain of and is some point between and .

Weird result, since we are re-defining in terms of the tangent at some point on it, plus this weird double derivative piece.

The proof uses GMVT followed by MVT.

Corollary:

Differentials notation



Some change in x and corresponding change in f(x).


Then,

Leibniz notation

Taylor Polynomials

This is the n-th Taylor polynomial, which is a generalization of linearization to higher degree polynomials.
Assumes is at least times diffable at .

Corollary

And it is a unique polynomial that satisfies this condition.
Why unique? (Some proof involving re-writing any polynomial in terms of x-a)

We can also iteratively compute , by just adding the new term.

Lagrange remainder

If exists for all in an interval containing and , then there exists some in between and s.t.

Note similarity of this error to the lin approximation error. Proof is by induction, but takes a bit of effort and algebra…

Big O

Defn: as if there exists and an open interval containing s.t. for all

Simple properties:

  1. If as , then for any .

  2. If and as , then as (use triangle inequality).

    1. If as , then

Equivalently:

is the unique polynomial of degree at most that approximates with error on the order of

Maclaurin Polynomials

:= Taylor polynomials at

Q: why are they useful?

Integrals

Defn: An anti-derivative of a function is a function s.t.

Defn: An indefinite integral of a function is written:

Chapters 5,6,7,8,9 of Single Variable Calc

  1. Area under a curve
  2. Note:
  3. Choose smaller and smaller to sum the true area under the curve

Reimann sum definition of definite integral

where the interval is divided into subintervals of equal width , and is a sample point in each subinterval.

Fundamental Theorem of Calculus

  1. First Part: It states that if is an antiderivative of a continuous function on the interval , then the definite integral of from to is given by:

This means that the integral (area under the curve) can be found using the antiderivative.

  1. Second Part: It states that if is continuous on and is defined by the integral , then the derivative of is :

This means that the derivative of the integral function recovers the original function.

Proof of part 1 (visually makes sense), uses reimann sum definition and MVT for integrals:

Integral MVT

For a continuous function on , there exists a point such that: